The Fosil Group Logo
Follow
  • Fosil Cycle
    • The Fosil Cycle
    • Connect
    • Wonder
    • Investigate
    • Construct
    • Express
    • Reflect
    • Skills Framework
  • Resources
  • Forum
  • Epistemology &
    Learning Memos
  • About
    • Purpose and Mission
    • History
    • Events
    • Newsroom
    • Members
  • Contact
Profile picture of Sam Pullan

Sam Pullan

Active 5 years, 9 months ago
Organisation: Highgate School
Role: Assistant Head
Town/City: London
Country: United Kingdom
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements
  • Favourites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 8th August 2019 at 5:07 pm in reply to: Pressure groups inquiry (A-Level Politics) #2500
    Sam Pullan
    Participant

      Jenny, Joe,

      Thanks for posting this very interesting thread, and for the link to the resources.  It’s a definite area of weakness in my teaching of the subject, I think because it’s one that lends itself the most to independent investigation which isn’t an area I’ve really concentrated on. In addition, in the early post the original inquiry seemed to include an “Imagine you’re the CEO” element which doesn’t seem to be mentioned later on – perhaps it was dropped? I wondered about what value that added. Similarly, I think I agree with your and Joe’s analysis of the end task involving made-up PGs, making leaflets etc.

      In the spirit of full disclosure, I am a bit sceptical of end products that don’t obviously benefit the learning. For example, I often wonder about the point of “Make a newspaper front page about X”.  For me, unless it is part of learning about journalese, the newspaper element is just a distraction.  It leads to more thought about punchy headlines, alliteration and “See our amazing feature on Love Island on [the non-existent] page three!” than about whatever it was they were actually supposed to be learning. This is why I’m so interested in FOSIL, which seems to me be an excellent and noble exploration into how to marry to joy of discovery with some rigorous scholarship and due respect for content.

      One more question. In Urban Myths About Learning and Education, Bruyckere, Herschel and Hulshof state that research shows problem-based learning (which I assume this is) “is not really suitable for acquiring new knowledge” (p56). They say this is because it tends to overload working memory. They go on to add that it can, however, give great value where used to apply existing knowledge. If I read your resources correctly, there seems a chance that you are trying to do the acquisition at the same time as solve the problem, which would run counter to the research quoted in the book. How would you refute this? (My contact with Jenny and Darryl thus far suggests you will have thought hard about it!)

      Thanks,

      Sam

    • Author
      Posts
    Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
    The Fosil Group Footer Logo
    Framework Of Skills for Inquiry Learning by Darryl Toerien is licensed under a Creative Commons
    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
    . Based on The Empire State
    Information Fluency Continuum
    developed by the New York City School Library System.

    Website Designed and Developed by Welland Creative Welland Creative Logo Privacy Policy
    School Library Association Logo
    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy policy